Progressive Forces calls for immediate lifting of U.S. blockage against Cuba

By Francis Kobena Tandoh

The Progressive Forces has publicly denounced the United States blockage against the Republic of Cuba as an illegal unilateral coercive force and is calling for the lifting of the blockage against the Latin American country, according to a joint statement released here.

The Forces demanded the immediate removal of Cuba from the “State Sponsor of Terrorism” list and is also calling for the complete and unconditional lifting of the economic, commercial, and financial blockage against the Caribbean country.

The statement signed by 54 organisations rejects the use of sanctions, financial exclusion, and economic siege as instruments of regime change, uphold Cuba’s inalienable right to political independence, self-governance, and territorial integrity and also insist that international disputes be addressed through diplomacy, dialogue, and multilateral mechanisms rather than gunboat diplomacy.

    Find the full joint statement as released by the Progressive Forces below;

    JOINT STATEMENT BY PROGRESSIVE FORCES CALLING FOR THE IMMEDIATE LIFTING OF THE UNITED STATES BLOCKADE AGAINST THE REPUBLIC OF CUBA

    1. We, the undersigned organisations and movements committed to social justice, sovereignty, anti-
    colonial struggle, and international law, unite in unequivocal condemnation of the ongoing economic blockade imposed by the United States against the Republic of Cuba.

      For more than six decades, this unilateral, intimidating policy has sought to subjugate a sovereign
      nation for choosing an independent political and economic path. It represents a sustained act of
      economic aggression aimed at generating hardship, destabilisation, and political submission. Such
      measures constitute collective punishment and directly contradict the principles of the United
      Nations Charter and the norms governing relations among sovereign states.

      The blockade, first imposed in 1960 and later entrenched through legislation including the Helms-
      Burton Act, extends beyond bilateral hostility. Its extraterritorial provisions penalise third countries, financial institutions, shipping companies, and corporations that engage in lawful trade
      with Cuba. In doing so, it weaponises the global financial system as an instrument of imperial
      coercion.

      The designation of Cuba as a “State Sponsor of Terrorism” has further intensified this siege. This
      label isolates the country from international banking systems, deters investment, blocks routine
      financial transactions, and obstructs humanitarian trade. Its reputational and compliance
      consequences exceed its legal framework, compounding the economic suffocation of the Cuban
      people.

      This policy persists despite overwhelming and consistent opposition within the United Nations
      General Assembly, where the international community has repeatedly called for its termination.
      The continued enforcement of the blockade demonstrates a refusal to respect multilateral
      consensus and international law.

      The consequences of this economic warfare constrain access to food imports, medical supplies,
      industrial equipment and energy inputs. Financial institutions, fearing secondary sanctions, decline
      legitimate transactions. Shipping firms avoid Cuban ports. These cumulative pressures hinder
      economic planning, strain public services, and impede national development.

      Yet Cuba’s international record stands in sharp contrast to the treatment it receives.
      During Africa’s liberation struggles, Cuba provided decisive military and technical assistance.
      Between 1975 and 1991, approximately 300,000 Cuban troops served in Angola in defense of the
      MPLA government against apartheid South Africa and external intervention. The Battle of Cuito
      Cuanavale marked a turning point that contributed to the independence of Namibia and the
      dismantling of apartheid. Leaders, including Nelson Mandela publicly acknowledged Cuba’s
      contribution to African freedom.

      Cuban solidarity extended to Guinea-Bissau, Mozambique, and other liberation movements across
      the continent. Military advisers, educators, and medical professionals served abroad under difficult
      conditions in support of Africa’s anti-colonial struggle.

      2. During the COVID-19 pandemic, Cuba dispatched medical brigades to dozens of countries across
      Africa, Latin America, Europe, and the Caribbean. Cuban scientists developed domestic vaccines
      despite restricted access to global supply chains. Even under blockade, Cuba contributed to
      international public health cooperation.

      The persistence of the blockade cannot be detached from geopolitical calculation and domestic
      political incentives within the United States. Cuba occupies a unique place in US strategic imperial
      thinking. Before 1959, significant portions of Cuban land, utilities, and tourism infrastructure were
      owned or controlled by US interests.

      The island functioned as a leisure extension of the mainland, centred on resort development, casino
      operations, and foreign corporate dominance. That historical memory remains embedded in
      segments of political and business discourse that view Cuba less as a sovereign nation and more
      as a future investment opportunity should the blockade cause political change.

      Guided by anti-imperialist principle and international solidarity, we call upon the conscience of
      the global community to:

      1. Publicly denounce the United States blockade as an illegal unilateral coercive measure and
        a violation of Cuba’s sovereignty.
      2. Demand the immediate removal of Cuba from the “State Sponsor of Terrorism” list.
      3. Call for the complete and unconditional lifting of the economic, commercial, and financial
        blockade.
      4. Reject the use of sanctions, financial exclusion, and economic siege as instruments of
        regime change.
      5. Uphold Cuba’s inalienable right to political independence, self-governance, and territorial
        integrity.
      6. Insist that international disputes be addressed through diplomacy, dialogue, and
        multilateral mechanisms rather than gunboat diplomacy.
      7. Encourage governments and parliaments to oppose extraterritorial sanctions and protect
        lawful trade relations.
      8. Organize public education campaigns, forums, and assemblies to expose the human cost of
        unilateral economic warfare.
      9. Stand in active solidarity with the Cuban people and with all nations resisting imperial
        domination.
        We affirm that sovereignty is not conditional on compliance with great power interests. If
        economic siege becomes normalised as a tool of political engineering, then the independence of
        all nations becomes precarious.
        Grounded in Pan-Africanism, anti-colonial history, and South-South solidarity, we reject economic
        strangulation as a method of international governance. We recommit ourselves to a world order
        rooted in equality among states, respect for sovereignty, and genuine multilateralism.
        Hands Off Cuba.
        End the Blockade Now.

      3. SIGNATORIES

      Action for the Development of Angolan Youth and Foreigners in Angola (ADJAE), Angola
      All-African People’s Revolutionary Party (A-APRP), Ghana
      Alliance for the Homeland and Pan-Africanism (APP), Benin
      ANJUD Association, Niger
      APP/Burkindi, Burkina Faso
      ASMEN, France
      BISO PEOPLE, Democratic Republic of the Congo
      Black Empowerment Ghana, Ghana
      Coalition of the Togolese Diaspora for Change and Democracy (CODITOGO), Togo
      Collectif Afrique, France
      Confederation of Pan-Africanist Associations and Movements of West Africa (CAMPAO),
      Burkina Faso
      Cultural Committee for Democracy in Benin (CCDB), Benin
      Debout Citoyen, Niger
      Federation of Trade Unions of Workers in Free Zone Enterprises and Industry, Madagascar
      Friends of Congo, Democratic Republic of the Congo
      Front for a Popular and Pan-African Anti-Imperialist Revolution (FRAPP), Senegal
      Harbist Movement, Djibouti
      Headquarters of the Revolution, Mali
      Jeunesse-Handicap, Mali
      Kisumu Peace and Justice, Kenya
      Labour Movement, Zambia
      Mabedja Pan-Africanists, Comoros
      Movement for African Emancipation (MAE), Nigeria
      National Coordination of Citizen Monitoring Associations, Burkina Faso
      National Council for the Defense of Democracy–Forces for the Defense of Democracy
      (CNDD–FDD), Burundi
      National Federation of Education (FNE), Morocco
      National Youth Council of Namibia, Namibia
      New Power Europe, Gabon
      Pan African Federalist Movement (PAFM), Togo
      Pan-African League – Umoja, France

      4. Pan-African Movement for a Free Africa, Central African Republic
      Pan-African Progressive Front, Ghana
      Pan-African Unitary Dynamic, France
      Pan-Africanism Today, South Africa
      Party of Progress and Socialism, Morocco
      Planet of Pan-Africanist Youth of Burkina Faso (PJP-BF), Burkina Faso
      Progressive Movement for African Peoples (MPA), Guinea-Conakry
      Socialist Movement of Ghana, Ghana
      Socialist Party – Zambia, Zambia
      State55 Afrika, Cameroon
      Suluhu, Comoros
      SYRES–Côte d’Ivoire (Union for the Revaluation of Secondary School Staff in Côte
      d’Ivoire), Côte d’Ivoire
      The Communist Party of Benin, Benin
      The Liberian People’s Party (LPP), Liberia
      The Pan-African Convergence, Cameroon
      The Pan-African Movement, Chad
      The Pan-African Movement for a Free Africa, Central African Republic
      The Pan-Africans, Democratic Republic of the Congo
      The Sudanese Communist Party, Sudan
      Trades Union Congress (TUC) of Ghana, Ghana
      Tunisia Forward Movement, Tunisia
      Union of the Populations of Cameroon – National Manifesto for the Establishment of
      Democracy (UPC-MANIDEM), Cameroon
      We Can Movement, Mauritania
      Women Concerns Center, Kenya

      Source: Ghana Eye Report

      Share Us
      0Shares